IMD looked impressive, but left me with no desire to obtain an MBA from them. Some of the scholars were impressed, others weren't. For me an MBA program there does not fit in with my plan, at least not at this point. I am trying to leave myself open to all kinds of possibilities while on this trip, and I constantly ask myself 'what if I did this...' to just try and feel things out. I am still not entirely convinced that doing an MBA in an intensive one year is the best method to receive one. It seems like the Stevens Henager approach, which to me is efficient but less effective. There are some things that you cannot shortcut and I think learning is one of them.
EDIT: My thoughts revisited a few days later-
After writing the above paragraph I spoke with Shannon about the topic and she pointed out to me what the difference is between Stevens Henager and IMD, and that is the faculty and methods. This makes sense to me. The quality of learning is heavily effected by the abilities of the teachers. I am glad I had this conversation with Shannon to adjust my point of view.
No comments:
Post a Comment